I believe character makes a novel and plot is just what the character
lives. I’ve loved being around people who were characters since I was a
child. Real characters are bigger than life, live either on the edge or
over the edge, and usually don’t give a fig about what people think of
them. It was the “character” in the tiny village where my grandparents
lived who dominated conversation. People sat around on the porch in
warm summers talking about the derring-do of the local characters. As a
child I sat off to the side or behind the porch swing or beneath the
dining table listening, a quiet little girl who was all ears. No one
was interested in the staid, upright, church-going, dull people who
never did anything slanderous or risky. Talk, instead, was about the two
drunks who decided one night to track down whatever strange creature
was screaming in the woods that summer. Off they went in the dead of
night with a hoe and an axe, looking for the boogeyman. One said he
would be the bait and the other would wait in hiding to hoe down the
monster as it screamed past him chasing the other man. This talk went
on for weeks with the adults unable to agree whether the knot on one
man’s head had been put there by a hoe wielded by a frightened, unsteady
hand, or had he merely fallen across a root in the woods? Did the two
men really hear the horrible beast scream in the night just feet away
from them through the brush? These men were characters, and their plot
was the decisions they made and the kind of life they lived.
I
grew up, then, loving character both in real life and in fiction. What
is THE GREAT GATSBY without Gatsby? What is Paul Theroux’s MOSQUITO
COAST without the off-kilter father who takes his whole family off the
grid and into a foreign jungle where he builds a machine to make ice? Plot and story flow
from a great character, not usually the other way around. At least not for me.
Gold Rush Dream by Billie Sue Mosiman
In my novels I always think of the person, the character, first, and
from that character comes her story. In GOLD RUSH DREAM, a
suspense-filled western with two characters who fall in love, the first
thing I wanted to do was write about a young woman who had grown up in
the Texas woods with her immigrant parents and then suddenly loses
them. I asked myself questions about Rose, this young protagonist. How
would she survive the harsh conditions of frontier life on her own? She
was fiercely independent, but she was also young, unsophisticated, and
untried by life. Along comes Travis, a lone trapper, who finds Rose
rising from the root cellar in the middle of a crumbled, smoking cabin
that had been burned to the ground by marauding Indians. Now the
character of Rose has more conflict to endure–sparking off another
strong character, Travis. I could see in my inner vision these
characters and I let them tell the story I wanted to read.
That’s another thing about writing novels. You get to tell yourself the
story you’ve never read, but would like to read. I wanted to know how
Rose would fare and how Travis would keep her safe. I wanted to know
what happened when they tried to cross the big wilderness of a frontier
country to get Rose to her remaining family in California. I wanted to
know if they would like one another and maybe even fall in love during
such an arduous journey. Then, what would happen about the outcast, mentally unstable Indian who tracked them, obsessed with Rose? Character led the way.
WIDOW by Billie Sue Mosiman
In WIDOW I wrote the most feminist novel I ever penned. I did not
set out to write a feminist novel. It was the character who lived the
feminist ideal and though she was emotionally damaged by a tragic
event–her husband killing her two children before her eyes then turning
the gun on himself–this was a woman who pulled herself out of insanity
and despair to grapple with what life had handed to her. Men, who I do
love by the way--but I am not the character--do not fare well in WIDOW at the hands of Shadow,
the woman who has determined she will never again let a man turn a
woman or a child into a victim. It was character who drove the novel.
Some readers confuse the author with their characters, and we can’t
get away from that, but, in the main, fictional characters are a
conglomerate of people an author has known or been acquainted
with–sometimes they’re simply imagined in whole. In researching the
subject matter of WIDOW I interviewed dozens of exotic dancers (the
occupation Shadow is forced to take on since she was, like many woman, a
housewife without skills or education). I interviewed a police
detective in order to write about my detective in the novel. But the
characters who found their way to the page were none of these real
people, nor were they me. They were creations that interested me most,
the characters who made me ask questions of them. What will you do now
your children are murdered and your husband a suicide? What will you do
now you’ve lost your home, your source of income, your mental balance?
How do you live with the despair and fight your way out of it? If you
take the law into your own hands, Shadow, how do you live with that and
do you really have that right? What if a copycat killer begins to
mimic your crimes, pinning them on you? How in the world can you stop
him, how can you ever exonerate yourself? What if you’re falling in
love with the one man, the detective, who is trying to find out who you
really are? Those were the questions that drove the story. I wanted to
know these answers and I believed readers would too.
Angelique by Billie Sue Mosiman
In my new novel, BANISHED, I was told the story about a
little girl who seemed evil, who might be a voodoo queen in New
Orleans. I began to think about that child and thought, well, what if
she’s not a child at all? What if she’s a fallen angel who has taken
that child’s body? What if she’s lived for hundreds of years? If that’s
the story then how and when did she possess that body? How did she
survive as a child without a parent all those hundreds of years? What
was her mission, who were her companions? So I started with character
only and from Angelique comes the story as she tells it to me. The
reason I kept writing the book that Angelique is a part of was to find out what was going to happen
next.
Without character, strong, resilient, sympathetic
character, plot doesn’t even matter. Unless I care about the
protagonist, I have no reason to follow the story. If I don’t care
about the characters I have no questions for them, therefore no plot
comes forth. All of my novels and stories are driven by character.
I am still listening to the stories I heard while
hiding under the dining table, but now I listen to them in my head and
try to translate them into a story people want to read. First I have to
want to read it. Only then can I hope someone else will. Characters,
the people in my novels, are as real to me as people I know and because
of who they are, what’s happened to them, and the directions they
take, I simply follow along telling the story of their lives–telling
the story to myself.
So true.. If an author can't make a character "live", there is no tale to be told period..
ReplyDeleteI probably should have talked more about conflict, too. A static character with no problems, living a happy life, can't keep our interest. The poor man or woman has to be in dire straits, or at the very least have a problem to solve that will take something out of the character or change the character. Thanks for reading the blog, AJ.
ReplyDelete